There are plans to split the current Education, Science and Culture Committee into two separate entities, one for education and science and one for culture. The latter is to be led by Karbauskis himself, while the Education and Science Committee is to be headed by Eugenijus Jovaiša, who was the dean of the Lithuanian Education University History Faculty.
Most importantly – Cultural Policy Law
Speaking on key priorities in his leadership of the Seimas Culture Committee, R. Karbauskis stressed that he would first and foremost work on the Cultural Policy Law. According to the politician, it is necessary to reform the structure and activities of the Cultural Support Fund (KRF).
“In my opinion, the KRF should also direct its activities to the regions of the country. Cultural projects in the regions can only be implemented when there is a clear policy and priorities for financing culture. Without getting into details, we can mention just the selection of Lithuanian culture capitals. What criteria are used to choose? And how were EU funds used for culture projects? What do we know about it? Nothing. We cannot dismiss the possibility that unused funds will have to return to EU institutions. Furthermore, projects made by state funded cultural institutions cannot have their projects funded by the KRF,” spoke Karbauskis.
He also pledged he will take action against protectionism and nepotism in the culture sphere. According to the “Peasant” leader, when there are no clear-cut criteria, what the cultural priorities of the state are and how financing is assigned, unwritten laws flourish – “who went to whom, who gained access to whom, who made a deal with whom.”
R. Karbauskis is also convinced that cultural financing should not be linked with funds received from alcohol, tobacco and gambling excises.
“Should culture funding really increase the more we drink and smoke? That’s shameful,” spoke R. Karbauskis.
Tax breaks for content creators
R. Karbauskis also has taxation for cultural projects and culture in general in mind. He plans to initiate a discussion of making creative content creation tax free.
“Culture and creative work are a special sphere. By providing tax breaks for our content creators, we would attract others from abroad as well. I am convinced that the added value of such a decision would be massive. This is why I will endeavour to convince politicians, that this is crucial in the cultural sphere,” mused Karbauskis.
By abolishing taxes for content creators, he believes that Lithuania could become a cultural hotspot for content creators across the world.
Attempting to implement old ministerial transfer plans
Speaking on transferring the ministries of agriculture and environment to Kaunas, R. Karbauskis assured that he has no doubts on the necessity of the decision and intends to seek agreement for this with his coalition partners.
“Moving the ministries to Kaunas is not an attempt to pander to the people of the city or a means to support our party during elections. Moving these two ministries from Vilnius to Kaunas would be first of all useful for the regions of the country, furthermore the education institutions related to these spheres are based specifically in Kaunas,” noted R. Karbauskis.
When asked if this would not potentially obstruct the work of the whole ministerial cabinet, with ministers and other officials having to travel a hundred kilometres both ways every day, the Peasant Greens leader responded that such concerns are baseless “First of all, moving the Ministry of Agriculture is an idea from the Conservative government minister Kazys Starkevičius, but they lacked the political will needed back then. And if ministers and their subordinates have to travel from Kaunas to Vilnius a few times per wekk, I see no tragedy – thousands of people commute from Vilnius to Kaunas.”
R. Karbauskis also remains intent on abolishing the Ministry of Energy and to move all the ministries from the centre of Vilnius to a more remote part of the city, but “under one roof”. Such an idea, according to him, would save a significant amount of funds for the budget.