Financial institutions operating in Lithuania consider the risk arising from the prolonged period of low interest rates as increasingly significant, although, with the persisting geopolitical tensions, the risk related to a likely exacerbation of Russia's and Ukraine's conflict and related consequences has been assessed as the major one, shows the survey conducted by the Bank of Lithuania.
© DELFI / Šarūnas Mažeika

"In the respondents' view, the risks related to the geopolitical tensions in the East and low interest rates continued to be the major ones. While the risk of the prolonged period of low interest rates is assessed as more likely than half a year ago, the likely exacerbation of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine has been considered as the most probable and major source of risk," says Tomas Garbaravičius, member of the Board of the Bank of Lithuania.

The fact that, in the opinion of financial market participants, the probability of a major event in the near future, having negative effects on the domestic financial system, increased for the second consecutive half-year, also reflected the significance of the geopolitical risk. About a third of those surveyed this year shared this view. Just as half a year ago, the exacerbation of geopolitical tensions in the East was mostly indicated as a likely major event, the Bank of Lithuania reports.

The prolonged period of low interest rates was considered as a major risk, and more likely than half a year ago; however, the probability that risk premiums will increase sharply was seen by respondents as low. The probability of low interest rate risk has increased over the half-year and was perceived as higher than medium. Banks saw this risk as somewhat more likely than other financial institutions. According to respondents, mitigating the risk is complicated, while the measures most often indicated include investment diversification, increasing of non-interest income and narrowing of the gap between liabilities and investment maturities.

The risk of cybercrimes is also treated by financial institutions as one of the most likely and capable of negatively affecting the domestic financial system. The assessment of this risk varies among financial institutions: banks envisage a higher probability of the realisation of this risk than insurance companies. Both the probability and the likely negative effects are assessed by respondents as higher than medium, while the risk, in their view, would be partly mitigated by investment in IT security and higher involvement on the part of the state, Lithuania's central bank said.

It is forbidden to copy the text of this publication without a written permission from ELTA.

Nauseda: state bank shouldn’t be taboo

The existing situation in the Lithuanian banking market makes one to start thinking about the...

Lithuania not considering 'century bond' yet

The Lithuanian Foreign Ministry sees no need for issuing ultra-long debt yet, but might consider...

Cabinet backs retail and bank taxes

The Lithuanian Cabinet on Wednesday backed in principle new taxes on bank assets and retail...

Masiulis claims Grybauskaite asked for MG Baltic's positive coverage

Eligijus Masiulis , ex-leader of Lithuania's Liberal Movement, accused of accepting a bribe, claims...

Offices of the future will have to offer more than the working premises

The office becomes an important tool to attract employees and is now not just the work premises, but...